1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
3 years ago
15

Who is argentinian captain when won the football World Cup 1986?

History
1 answer:
Anestetic [448]3 years ago
3 0

<span>The captain of the FIFA world cup in 1986 was captained by Diego Maradona. He was the one responsible for the Hand of God goal – a play that Maradona did when he cut inside from the left and did a low pass into his teammate. He continued running towards a one-two movement, and was able to play it nearly behind his teammate and midfielder Steve Hodge of the opposing England team. It was a goal that was miscued and its infringement wasn’t called by the referee.</span>

You might be interested in
What did Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak believe Americans would want?
alexdok [17]
Electronics was what they believed they should want as citizens 
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How and why has Civilization changed over time?It has changed because people are lazy and they rely on other people to live.
vichka [17]

Answer:

Civilization has become more complex and judgemental.

Explanation:

I think this because now there are phones, cars, and clothes. Back in the 1950s, there was no touchscreen phones or computers. And peoples opinions of everything have changed as well, there is racism and stereotypes.  People have explored the depths of the sea with contraptions, they have made them better, more helpful to society. People thought back then that being on a computer was being a nerd, now its ¨cool¨ to be on a device. A lot of people judge others on what they look like, not what their personality says. People dont really understand the meaning of things like they used to.  Some people rely on others to do their work, not really understanding the subject of it all. Civilization has found newer things to build with, such as glass, concrete, bricks, etc... but some of us have lost love and care for our Earth, we just take and never give back.

7 0
3 years ago
Consider the legacy of Napoleon. Was he mostly a hero or mostly a tyrant? How should history view his reign? Write one to two pa
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

Napoleon was both a hero and a tyrant.

He was heroic when he brought law and order back to France, when the country was in chaos after the French Revolution. Then, he became a tyrant when he declared himself Emperor.

However, many of the principles that guided the French Revolution where included in his regime, and he developed a system of laws that is used in most of continental Europe to this day: the Napoelonic Code.

He got himself into many wars attempting at building a French-dominated Europe, and almost succeeded at it. He was defeated only because essentially of all Europe became his enemy, and joined forces against him.

As we can see, Napoleon is a complex and fascinating figure that cannot be classified as either a tyrant or a hero. He was both.

5 0
3 years ago
Which sentence from the passage supports the following statement? Market economies bring people more freedom and safety.
BigorU [14]

Answer A market economy brings a better government and stability for people.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened to Louis Napoleon after his second attempt?
bija089 [108]

Answer:

The biggest principle that the allies wanted to clean up after Napoleon was legitimacy.

Explanation:

Napoleon was a legitimate, recognized head of state, who everyone except England was allied with at one time or another. As a foreigner, they couldn’t execute the French head of state for acting on behalf of France. To just declare him a criminal and shoot him would have been admitting that the Czar of Russia and Emperor of Austria had been making deals with a criminal.

Also, some of the allies LIKED changes made by Napoleon and wanted to keep it. For example, Kings of the Confederation of the Rhine wanted to keep being Kings, not Grand Dukes or Electors. It was in their interest to not declare Napoleon an outright criminal.

Even the allies holding him on St. Helena wasn’t backed by law. How they were treating Napoleon had no legal precedence. They were making things up as they were going along. The reason why the British would never allow Napoleon to set foot on England was that Napoleon’s supporters would have filed a Habeas Corpus suit on behalf of Napoleon and make the British courts answer what law they were holding Napoleon under.

In the long run it actually played to the advantage of British that Napoleon was alive and under their control. Letting loose Napoleon was the ultimate political trump card they had against the Germans and the French.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Shogun mean
    15·2 answers
  • What does the congress have the power to punish this on the high seas
    10·1 answer
  • What happened during a performance of Henry VIII in 1613?
    12·1 answer
  • Christian humanists believed that
    8·2 answers
  • Explain three (or more) specific ways the British transitioned
    7·1 answer
  • 2 reasons for pollution in cities during the late 1800s
    9·2 answers
  • What was the race to Fashoda? Who won?
    8·2 answers
  • What is non flowering plants which use seeds instead of spores in order to reproduce<br>​
    5·2 answers
  • 20. The US tried to jusoy their colonze<br> They were preparing the natives for independence -
    6·1 answer
  • Helpppppp me please!!<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>plz answer fast​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!