Answer: a practice in which executives get out of their offices and learn from others in the organization through casual face-to-face dialogue.
Explanation: Management by walking around (MBWA) refers to a practice in which executives get out of their offices and learn from others in the organization through casual face-to-face dialogue.
In this management style, executives pay casual, unplanned visits to staff in their work areas to understand their work environment, experience first hand their status reports instead of waiting for them to be delivered to their office. Management by walking around fosters a better work environment through better communication, a hands-on experience of the conditions of the workplace by managers as well as quick and effective problem solving.
Answer:
Kingbird Company
a. The amount of Net Sales = $5,040.
b. The amount of the estimated liability for refunds = $180
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Units of products sold to Logan Inc. = 290
Selling price = $18
Sales revenue = $5,220 ($18 * 290)
Cost of each unit = $11
Expected returns = 10/290 = 0.03448
Net sales = $5,220 * (1 - 0.03448)
= $5,040
Estimated liability for refunds = $180 ($5,220 - $5,040)
Answer:
If the effective tax rate increases then the net savings coming from investments will get lowered as a result the investment will have higher payback period (The increase in effective tax rate would lower demand of the product which means there is decline in net saving arising from the sale of the product). Likewise this decrease in annual net savings will also decrease the internal rate of return which shows that their are increased chances of project rejections. The NPV method is based on cash flows and relevant costing just like IRR and payback method but the only difference is that it assumes that the cash earned would be reinvested at cost of capital. The NPV will also decrease due to increased effective tax rate.
Answer:
I also love making friends dude ✌✌I will surely follow you
Answer: C. inefficiently low; inefficiently high
Explanation:
If the cotton farmers are not made to pay for the damage that their pesticides cost then they will maintain production at a relatively high level because their input costs will be relatively low. As a result of this high level of production, the price of the goods will be relatively low as well. The point at which both market equilibrium quantity and price are at in this scenario are considered inefficient because they are not taking into account, the true cost of production being the effects of the pesticides being used.
However, if they are made to pay for this negative externality that they are the cause of, it will increase their production cost and force them to reduce production to keep these costs low. As they reduce production, the market price will increase as supply is less.
