1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
6

Create two posts from each of the groups listed below. The posts should be written from the point of view of the group. You may

type your posts directly into the appropriate blanks in the template.
German Americans
Jewish Americans
Asian Americans
Hispanic Americans
Women
Dissenters
History
1 answer:
serg [7]3 years ago
3 0

I have been serving overseas for the government

And the behavior is the United States is way

More courteous than it was once

There were many women who now

Got “regular” jobs to fill men’s spots at war

Rather than being circumscribed to take care

Of the house and kids like a maid

Soon, women really hope to

Gain the right to vote

And surely the government will be

Having to see it than women would be

Known as useful citizens of society

I am here

Just basically being purposely forced

To live here in both such mockery and anxiety

Some of the given stores that were provided

Have been sadly sabotaged

And one of our own were brutally killed by the noose

Non-American oppressions are being tolerated

Not just the government but

Also by certain constitutional principles

That have basically been terminated

Other Americans infrequently treat us with admiration

Orchestras reject to composition or play the works

Of our homeland’s own composers

And German elements of the everyday

American life has really been changed

Jewish Americans

I have been treated without

Either respect or ever esteem

What’s observed closely were

The newspapers, labor unions, and socialists

Whenever any person would speak

Out anything against the war

We were then hushed and then told

That it is obligatory or essential

Even though I mainly feel as if many people

Have really been forced to take

The rules and regulations into our own hands

Yet the government still is overpowering us

The Ku Klux Klan is now

Having views of an anti-Semitic

The government is going little to assist us

The nerve of the government not helping

I have been experiencing discrimination

Every day in my life

There were people banding in unison

To support the war’s effort

Then created many organizations

To support both raise money and the troops

<em>Mark this as BRAINLIEST This took lot of work!!!</em>

You might be interested in
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
What person stood by Elizabeth Cady Stanton in her efforts to include wones suffrage in the declaration?
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

Stanton often worked with Susan B. Anthony

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was control of Texas important to both confederacy and the union? Which side controlled Texas during the Civil War?
serg [7]

Texas declared its secession from the Union on February 1, 1861, and joined the Confederate States on March 2, 1861, after it replaced its governor, Sam Houston, when he refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy. As with those of other States, the Declaration was not recognized by the United States government at Washington. Some Texan military units fought in the Civil War east of the Mississippi River, but Texas was most useful for supplying soldiers and horses for Confederate forces. Texas' supply role lasted until mid-1863, after which time Union gunboats controlled the Mississippi River, making large transfers of men, horses or cattle impossible. Some cotton was sold in Mexico, but most of the crop became useless because of the Union naval blockade of Galveston, Houston, and other ports.

3 0
3 years ago
What quadrilateral has exactly one pair of parallel sides
Vesna [10]
<span>A  quadrilateral that has exactly one pair of parallel sides, is a </span>Trapezoid.
5 0
3 years ago
Byzantium was located between the trade routes of the ___1___ and the ___2___
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

idk help me

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What impact did then french revolution have on the rest of europe
    6·1 answer
  • What is the other battlefield of the cold war
    5·1 answer
  • Should it be easy to change goverments often
    9·2 answers
  • What do you know about Chet wilkins
    13·1 answer
  • What did Daniel Webster defend in his famous Second Reply to Hayne?
    7·1 answer
  • Irony means :<br>A)Tunnel vision<br>B)Probable cause<br>C)Caustic remark <br>D)Clean slate​
    6·2 answers
  • Which motive best completes the diagram?
    7·1 answer
  • Who invented the vaccum cleaner?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following choices correctly matches the U.S. president to his foreign policy?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain term of separation of power
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!