Sarah’s hand were cold and clammy.
One of the reasons people destroy or get rid of what they don't understand is the fear of the unknown. This fear is deeply anchored on self-preservation.
<h3>Examples of people getting rid of what they don't understand</h3>
<em>One key example of how this is practiced is in the relationship between man and animals</em>. People who are afraid that a certain kind of animal might hurt them are more likely to support hunting or killing such an animal.
<em>The other example is in relation to people. </em>Over the history of mankind, man has helped to destroy one another because of the fear of self-preservation. A fake document called Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which alleged that the Jews had a plan to take over the world triggered the Holocaust.
<h3>The danger of the mindset above</h3>
The irony is that many times, due to ignorance, a person or a group of people may do away with the very thing that can preserve or better their life.
- See the link below for related concepts to Self-preservation:
brainly.com/question/21601257
- The link below speaks to how animals help the entire ecosystem:
brainly.com/question/842527
- the link below speaks to how much Jew has contributed to mankind:
brainly.com/question/7665971
Answer:
It changes your way of understanding because as you get closer your perspective of that object,that is; the way too see it will be different.
Explanation:
Noam ChomskAs Chomsky’s work continued, he posed a novel approach to thinking about language, called the theory of Universal Grammar. This intricate theory includes the idea that humans are genetically endowed with knowledge of the linguistic features of which language is composed and the ability to determine how those features are organized into the language(s) they hear around them. y is known as the father of modern linguistics. Back in 1957, Chomsky, with his revolutionary book “Syntactic Structures,” laid the foundation of his non-empiricist theory of language. Two years later, with his review of B. F. Skinner’s “Verbal Behavior,” he argued that Behaviorism, the dominant approach to language at the time, was no longer to be the way of studying language.
