The answer is they both face barriers that restrict their freedom
We might be able to just tell me what the question is and which story :)
"Then the rebels will overcome the empire's troops and take the city."
This is the answer because it is still hypothetical. The other options imply that it has already happened or is happening, however it is just the fear of the leaders.
(Also, for curiosity's sake- what is the context? It sounds like Star Wars.)
Julius Caesar is a play deeply concerned with the idea of rhetoric, or persuasion. The play is driven by persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the story in motion. The resolution of the plot is decided by Antony's speech to the plebeians. Shakespeare sees rhetoric as one of the most powerful forces in the world; able to topple kings and crown them. The play, Julius Caesar, examines what gives rhetoric its power by pitting Brutus's speech against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's rhetoric to be superior by the effect he has on the plebeians.
Brutus's speech fails to convince permanently win over the crowd because he does not understand them. His first failure is at the beginning of his speech when he asks the plebeians to, "Censure me in you wisdom, and awake your senses". It seems as though he does not realize that he is speaking to an angry mob. His argument is based on cold and calculating reason. He argues that the love of freedom is stronger than the ties of friendship. "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more". This logic cannot sink deeply into an emotional mob. He asks the plebeians to "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe". He cannot use his honor as a reason for belief in his story when his honor is in question. Brutus fails to offer any proof of Caesar's ambition, the central point of his argument. He ends his speech with a verbal attack on any who disagree with him, essentially calling them cowards. This silences dissension temporarily but when the other side is presented it does not help his cause. Brutus's argument fails because he much less a man of the people than he would like to think.
Mark Antony's argument is a great piece of rhetoric. He successfully accomplishes his object of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. He has mastered the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He uses emotional phrases such as, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar" and "Oh judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts". Which give him a connection with the emotion the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar. He begins not by attacking Brutus..
Time Safari Inc. is a safari that takes people in the present to the faraway past, in the short story "A Sound of Thunder".
<u>Explanation:</u>
"A Sound of Thunder" is a science fiction short story by Ray Bradbury.
In it he presents the further-est future, wherein it is possible to travel back in time to the age of the dinosaurs.
It invites wealthy hunters to enjoy the hunting of the dinosaurs, an experience that would otherwise not be possible.
But there are certain precautions that the time safari guides have to take which are:
- people who are traveling to the past should not step out of the time path that they are traveling in, as as to maintain the time path.
- the safari guides tag the dinosaurs which can be hunted upon, and only those creatures can be shot at by the travelers. This is done by the guides traveling beforehand and knowing which creature is about to die, and targeting that creature only. This way the past does not change at all and is maintained.
- no one is supposed to take along anything from the past environment except for the memories and the experience, so the past is kept as it is supposed to be, or else the future would change.
Thus, these are the guidelines that the safari guides take in the "A Sound of thunder".
