Answer:
The Adaptationist Fallacy can prove very costly to biologist who are assuming it wrong according to the function in the environment. Let us have an example of the phenotype of wheat diploid breed that produces non-bearded grains variety, but we cannot assume it as a beneficial phenotype without further extensive research. After research, we came to know that there is also a major hexaploid bearded variety, that produces more number of grains. That's how, the Adaptationist Fallacy may prove fatal if we have assumed diploid as a major beneficial phenotype.
D, specifically because if the parents have/had this, it is likely the patient does
In some cases, skin cancers are hereditary and an increased risk of developing the disease can be passed from parent to child. If members of the same or multiple members being diagnosed the chance it being passed down to your children is higher.
Hope this helps:)
<span>The experimental evidence that leads </span><span>scientists to believe that only quantized electronic energy states exist in atoms </span>was the Niels Bohr experiment on Hydrogen gas. The quantized model for electron orbits in atoms that effectively explained the spectroscopic behavior of the atoms. Each line in the spectrum corresponds to one exact frequency of light emitted by the atom.
