1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
5

How did political divisions during the Cold War affect the Korean War, the Cuban missile crisis, and the Vietnam War

History
1 answer:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
4 0

First of all it is very important to define the events here.

1) Korean War was a conflict which began when some 75.000 soldiers from the North of Korea People's Army Poured the 38th parallel the boundary between the Soviet-backed the Democratic  people's Republic of Korea to the north and the north western republic of Korea to the South.

2) Cuban Missile Crisis was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the U.S. and the Union Sovietica  during cold war.( 1962).

3) Vietnam War:  Was a long, costly conflict between communist north of Vietnam and the Viet Cong again south vietnam and the United States.

The politics divisions produced that these conflicts took more time.

You might be interested in
A difference between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X was that Martin Luther King Jr. believed in
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer: Non-violence

Explanation: King grew up in a middle class family and was well educated. Meanwhile, Malcolm X grew up in an underprivileged environment that was very hostile with barely any schooling. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, throughout his entire ministry. He always stood his ground, and he stood out because even though he may have been physically attacked, he never reacted with violence. Martin Luther King Jr. followed the Christian faith. Malcolm X, however, was a Muslim, and believed in Muslim principles (<u><em>I'm not being at all discriminatory on any religions here)</em></u>. He believed in fighting back physically. Whatever had to be done to get freedom he was all for it whether it be violence or non-violence. Although later in life he visited Jerusalem, and met other Muslims. He changed his views, and became non-violent.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement explains how the Tenth Amendment differs from the rest of the Bill of Rights?
kotegsom [21]

<em>B. The Tenth Amendment protects the powers of states, rather than individual liberties.</em>

Explanation:

Most of the Bill of Rights goes over and protects individual liberties, like freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, protection of unreasonable searches, etc. This is where the Tenth Amendment differs.

The Tenth Amendment grants any and all of the powers that are not reserved to the national government, to the states. This was very important, as many people during this time were scared of tyranny and were nervous about the national government having too much power. While things are still reserved for the government, the states have the power to do the rest.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the meaning of the phrase you be a man as it is used in the excerpt?
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

b i think

Explanation:

hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
The chart shows the consequences of World War I on France and Britain. A 3-column table with 3 rows titled Cost of War. Column 1
Minchanka [31]

Answer:

Based on the chart, the one that best explains why France and Britain approached peace talks differently than the United States is that These countries suffered a large number of deaths, casualties, and severe economic loss as a result of the war.

Explanation:

France and Great Britain were severely affected by The World Wide War I, these numbers represent millions of loss in many ways that will continue affecting the country afterwards, the economic affectation was not only because of the quantity shown after war but all the citizens who died in it and will leave unsupported families that will experience unbalance and financial problems.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was an attempt to form a bridge between the philosophy of aristotle and the teachings of the christian church?vernacular l
Mademuasel [1]
The correct answer for this given question would be the last option. The one that was an attempt to form a bridge between the philosophy of Aristotle and the teachings of the christian church is SCHOLASTICISM. By definition, scholasticism<span> was the method of teaching that dominated the schools of Western Europe from about 1100 until about 1600. </span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the importance of Latin during the Scientific Revolution in Europe?
    14·2 answers
  • In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the dominant factor in foreign affairs was
    8·2 answers
  • What is one way in which factory work changed people's lives?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the fallowing can often lead to gridlick in the legislative process?
    12·1 answer
  • From Quebec, the French embarked on an exploratory and fur-trading mission south into the Great Lakes region, the Mississippi va
    5·2 answers
  • Historically, which combination of characteristics have most presidents of the U.S. Shared? Question 6 options: A. Self-educated
    10·2 answers
  • How did the 14th Amendment apply in Gaines' case?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to the outbreak of the Korean War?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements describe Sargon's achievements as an empire builder?
    6·1 answer
  • What comparison is the simile making in the poem the old year
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!