B. They earned more money than their parents.
Being in risk of an injury can cause a death of its not treated well. You may get an infection which could lead to fatal death.
If the child missed school how are they supposed to get an education so they can have a brighter path in their life for their future? That’s going to be a negative consequence.
If a job is dangerous you are already in the risk of dying, getting a wound, or possibly getting killed. That’s definitely a negative consequence.
Your best choice would be B because even though they are getting more money than their parents they’re still wanting money and at the end of the day that’s the only thing that matters.
The Compromise of 1790
The Compromise of 1790 was a compromise between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson with James Madison where Hamilton won the decision for the national government to take over and pay the state debts, and Jefferson and Madison obtained the national capital (District of Columbia) for the South. Hamilton's plan was to retire the old depreciated obligations by borrowing new money at a lower interest rate.
Answer:
d. Massachusetts
Explanation:
The colonies in the United States were divided into three parts, South colonies, Middle colonies, and New England colonies. The division was mostly based on the specialization of the colonies, as well as their politics.The New England colonies, including Massachusetts, were colonies that were focused on shipbuilding and fishing industries. As these two industries were developing, Massachusetts started to flourish, the economy was constantly on the rise, and this colony was gradually becoming wealthier and wealthier. This was also one of the first colonies to start industrializing in the United States.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The concerns that George Washington had about the nation's foreign affairs were that he recommended the United States government not to have permanent relationships with other countries because they could "blind" further objective decisions. What he said what that it was better to have temporary relationships in case of emergencies. He thought more about short-term alliances.
This vision cannot be applicable today in a modern and globalized world in which we are interconnected and depend on trade and political alliances with other nations.
The foreign policy of a democratic nation has to be one of cooperation because, in these times, a nation alone is deemed to isolation and many problematic consequences.