Answer:
Anne: is a lively, curious girl of thirteen at the beginning of the play. She remains optimistic throughout the months they are in hiding and always makes the best of the situation she is in.
Mr. van Daan: is intelligent, opinionated, pragmatic, and somewhat egotistical. He is temperamental, speaks his mind openly, and is not afraid to cause friction, especially with his wife, with whom he fights frequently and openly.
Mr. Dussel particularly difficult to deal with because he shares a room with her, and she suffers the brunt of his odd personal hygiene habits, pedantic lectures, and controlling tendencies.
Answer:
This is a weird question but I think the answer is D
The assignment wants to know something personal about how you see how you have lived. As I don't have access to this I can't write the essay, but I'll show you how to write it.
<h3>Steps to writing an essay</h3>
- Introduction: Present how you see your life and the way you have positioned yourself in it. Be objective and write a short paragraph, with a maximum of 4 lines.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. They will be larger as you will have to explain the elements of your life. In the first, show how you have positioned yourself correctly and sought to establish a fair and positive standard of living. In the second paragraph, show how even trying to position yourself correctly, you have been making mistakes and reinforce how these mistakes are important, although difficult to deal with.
- Conclusion: Show what position as a baseball player you would occupy, taking into account everything you exposed about your life in the essay.
An example of how you might write your essay introduction can be seen below.
<em>After reflecting a lot on my existence, I realized that my life is full of ups and downs. This lack of stability may not have a big impact on the physical world, since I don't make much difference in the world, but it has a great emotional impact that has made me reflect on myself and the decisions I've made.</em>
Learn more about writing an essay:
brainly.com/question/8407102
#SPJ1
Answer:
Westermarck was telling us that there are no absolute standards in morality and that moral truth is relative. The reason for his approach is that each person has a moral conscience that is unique. One cannot apply a standard theory of philosophical thought to each person, because each person’s morality is predicated upon the way he or she was brought up. Virtue Ethics deals with a person’s character, and the formation of that character has its beginnings at an early age by what that person was taught. Westermarck and Aristotle have similar thought processes involving an individual. Aristotle believed that moral virtue is product of habit learned from an early age. Westermarck thought that moral views were based upon subjective factors. Subjective habits are learned from parents, teachers, and life experiences unique to an individual. A consciousness of morality is derived from those teachings and experiences learned in youth. These moral thoughts were a product of reflection of what had been taught overtime, and which would become rational expressions of individual morality as an adult. Is it not true that the virtue of person is based upon what his or her moral conscience consists of? The psychological effects of these teachings and experiences gleamed in youth cannot be discarded as mere sophomoric intrusions of moral liabilities against the standards of morality, but must be considered an integral component for the search of moral truth. Westermarck’s theory is just as valid as any other moral theory.
Explanation:
Answer:
She teaches her child that equality is essential.
Explanation:
Supporting evidence in the text:
"By marching, we’ll be letting the government know that we want those unfair laws to be changed. ... One way or another, we’re going to <em>make sure the government hears our message</em>."
