Smart cards have the discomfort to retrieve information from a stolen card. As the sizeof the card is small it can be easily misled.
Explanation:
- A smart card is otherwise known as an integrated circuit card or chip card. Usually, it is a plastic credit card sized card.Personal identification, authentication, data storage, and application processing may be provided by smart cards.
- Applications include identification, banking, cell phones, public transportation, computer security, schools, and health care. So it can lead to misuse.
- Smart cards depend on the electrical energy for use. It has an increased cost of production. It is unsafe for fluids.
- The only way to avoid such scams is for retailers to assure they take the EMV guidelines precariously and connect suitable systems to read smart cards and train staff handling payments properly. This applies especially to small and medium-sized businesses that are typically targeted by scammers.
You are to answer this question based on your own opinion. Sorry. :/
Answer:
the fruit came first
Explanation:
here is and explanation....there is none
Answer:
(how to pronounce it nai jr.) Niger is a country in africa with 50.12% under 15
Explanation:
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]
