Answer:
9(t+5)<6
t<-13/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The expression is 9(t+5)<6
Distributing the 9, we get
9t+45<6
9t<-39
t<-13/3
320
You add all the numbers together then divide by how many numbers there was. In this case all the numbers added to 6405. You divide by 20 because there were 20 numbers. This will get you to 320.25. The closest answer choice would be 320
Scotts method is linear because the number of minutes increased by an equal number every week
4y is 55% of 7.27 i believe?
I belive,
The experimental probability could be more, the same or less than the theoretical probability of rolling a 1 (which is 1/6).
The larger your sample (i. e., as you go beyond 60 tosses), the closer the two different probabilities are likely to be. (Think: Law of Large Numbers).