An editorial include an opposing viewpoint because they need to recognize it. If there is no opposing viewpoint, they look like they think there is only one side and no one else. Opposing viewpoints are very important because first, you can recognize them, and second, you can make corrections of their stance.
According to the excerpt, it can be inferred that the most appropriate option is that the pedestrian prevails because drivers must keep their cars in safe operating conditions (option B).
<h3>What is this case about?</h3>
In this case, the story of a man who buys a new car and it comes out defective from the factory is exposed, so he has to send it to be repaired. However, he continues to have faults and causes an accident to a pedestrian.
In general, in this case even though the driver is not at fault because he was on his way to the shop to get his car repaired again. He is the one who is going to be most affected because he must pay for the damages caused to the pedestrian, because he must guarantee the proper functioning of his car.
According to the above, it can be inferred that the correct answer is B, because the driver must ensure that his car works well to avoid causing traffic accidents while driving.
Learn more about driving in: brainly.com/question/10648228
#SPJ1
Answer:
To take her home.
Explanation:
In the story "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller, Tituba was a black slave who is in her forties. She is the slave of Reverend Parris. Being a black slave girl she had no status, so when accused of black magic. she accepts her guilt from escaping the physical punishment of death.
She wants the devil to take her away home. Tituba in the prison was desiring to be at her home so she calls on to the devil to take her home.
In Act Four, she cries out <em>" Take me </em><u><em>home</em></u><em>, Devil! Take me </em><u><em>home</em></u><em>! " </em>
The answer to this question will be B
Answer:
Future
Explanation:
Will tells you that it is future tense