Answer:
I'm sorry sir but there is no specific name for that action. I tried to search on google about that and I didn't find anything
Explanation:
Answer:
A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.
Explanation:
There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.
Answer:
The correct answer is: B. Criticize more.
Explanation:
To nit-pick is to unnecessarily criticize unimportant details that do not change the intended meaning of the original sentence.
For example, if someone is talking about an event that took place "in the 90's" and someone barges in to correct the first person and tell them that "in reality, it took place in 1992", that is nit-picking.
I believe the answer is John Locke
