Answer:
Nani? OwO ✨
Explanation:
Huh? What's your question? I do love the park tho-✨ ✨
Answer:
Argumentative writing.
Explanation:
This is a type of non-fiction in which points are made in order to convince, bring new knowledge, and offer suggestions.
This type of writing is mostly used when debating, or rebuffing something. Points are presented and opinions are also countered, thus type of non-fiction writing is meant to convince.
Calling someone exuberant is a way of saying that person is "excited" or "full of energy" so the answer is going to be A.
Answer:
D) I tried to drive before the light turned red, but stopped when it did
E) I tried to drive when the light was still yellow, but stopped when it turned red.
Explanation:
Given the fact that the question is incomplete and example 2 (which is said to be a garbled sentence, confusingly written) was not given, we can assume that it was talking about a person trying to beat the red light.
With this in mind, the two revisions below that would clarify its meaning are options D and E because they make the most sense.
With the help of inductive reasoning, he reached the conclusion that segregation laws are all unjust.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the three part deductive statement, the major premise was all the laws that degrade the human personality are unjust. The minor premise was segregation laws degrade the human personality and therefore the conclusion was that the segregation laws are unjust.
This conclusion has been derived from the evidences like the hate filled policemen kick brothers and sisters. African American caught in an airtight prison of poverty. They were excluded from amusement parks. All this degraded the human personality and were unjust.
