Researchers with a positivist philosophy believe that by being objective and unbiased they can see reality clearly, while researchers with a post positivist philosophy believe that they can only achieve inter subjective agreement about the nature of reality.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The researcher who believe on the philosophy of positivism have a clear sense of seeing facts. They believe that these facts are empirical evidence. They believe that it is the law that exists in general according to which the society is acting accordingly. The knowledge or the views that is based on the intuition or instinct will not be considered by these researchers.
Those views that amends to the views of positivism is called as post positivism. Post empiricism is the other name for this. This is because they will not consider the empirical evidences. They believe that what is observed can differ from the theories, background knowledge of the researcher and their values to a greater extent. They believe only on the reality.
482939585859394858383839448393993
Answer:
The right solution is "leads to more NGRI verdicts".
Explanation:
- NGRI seems to be an actionable defense, as well as the claimant submits the plea. At either the result, a jury determines if another individual became NGRI at either the scene of the offense.
- A conviction or attempting to find NGRI indicates that the individual either didn't even understand the inappropriateness of his acts at both the scene of the offense as well as had been unable to strictly adhere his conduct to something like the laws of the nation suffering from a mental disorder rather than deficiency.
Answer:
The NRA generically vilifies people who represent and advocate for liberal and progressive gun policies, labeling them the “violent Left.”58 It exploits and expands the political divisions between the law-abiding gun owner and the political left in an effort to discredit the work that is being done by gun violence prevention advocates, similar to how Duterte attempted to undermine Senator De Lima’s credibility—and, subsequently, her investigation into his drug war—by making crass comments about her personal life.59 NRATV program host Grant Stinchfield recently deployed this divisive tactic by claiming that law-abiding citizens were essentially at war with progressives, stating:
The threats from many on the Left are turning to violence and intimidation. All of this tears at the heart of a nation because we aren’t just divided anymore, we are in an all-out fight, a brawl. While we try to fight fair with truth on our side, the Left uses a win-at-all-costs mentality. It means they no longer play fair. That is the greatest threat to our nation.60
Explanation:
Yes, i think the spanish should accepted it.<span>the new laws of 1542 was a proposal for the spanish settlers to do preservation upon native indians in america.
</span>If the spanish accepted this, they might be able to form a mutually profitable trade relationship with the natives rather than have to be in constant conflicts with them
