Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
The sentecnce that sounds the most inapporiate
He wasn't intellectually gifted but he was not necessarily a fool
A. Sharecroppers worked the fields
B. Many formerly enslaved children could not read
C. There was tension between white landowners and formerly enslaved people
E. People had complicated identities and family relationships
Explanation:
The line that best paraphrases the excerpt is A. And when I think that I’ll never see you again, beautiful creature (...).
To paraphrase is to express the meaning of something by rewording it in a different way. Both the excerpt and option A express the same: that the poet is considering the possibility of never looking at the beautiful "creature" again.
