I believe the answer is: It won't be able to eat.
In wild life, this type of condition is basically a death sentence for the organism who experience it. The only way for the tiger to survive in such situation is only if humans making an intervention by surgically fix them or find another pathways to injects the nutrition into the tiger's body.
<u>Answer:</u>
On the off chance that you <em>kick the bucket</em> during the term, a passing advantage is paid out. On the off chance that you don't pass on during the term, the approach ends toward the finish of the term.
A noteworthy advantage of this sort of approach is that the excellent cash come back to you is <em>totally tax-exempt,</em> as it isn't viewed as salary yet just a discount of premiums.
As you're looking into term <em>life coverage approach choices,</em> you may go over the expression yearly sustainable premium.
Be that as it may, for an every year <em>sustainable premium term approach</em>, the top notch will build every year. After some time it's conceivable to pay more in premiums than what might have been paid for a <em>level premium term approach.</em>
Answer: check
Explanation:
A <em>check</em> is drawn on a financial institution and is payable upon demand.
Answer:
The correct solution is "
".
Explanation:
According to the question,
Let,
For stock 1,
The number of shares to be purchased will be "
".
For stock 2,
The number of shares to be purchased will be "
".
For stock 3,
The number of shares to be purchased will be "
".
then,
The cumulative number of shares throughout stock 1 would be well over or equivalent towards the approximate amount of all the shares or stocks for the set limit.
i.e., 
Thus the correct equation is "
".
