Answer: 4.5 I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C. -4n + 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Try the formulas and see which works.
__
The common difference is -4, so the coefficient of n in the explicit formula is -4. Every term is divisible by 4, so there won't be 3 anywhere in the formula.
__
-4·1 +8 = 4
-4·2 +8 = 0
-4·3 +8 = -4
-4·4 +8 = -8
The formula -4n+8 reproduces the sequence exactly.
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Average per week in sales = $8000
Steve hopes that the results of a trial selling period will enable him to conclude that the compensation plan increase the average sales per salesperson
So, the appropriate null and alternate hypothesis would be
b. What is the Type I error in this situation? What are the consequences of making this error?
Type 1 error are those errors in which null hypothesis are supposed to be rejected, but it does not get rejected.
It means sales per week is greater than $8000 but in actual it is not.
c. What is the Type II error in this situation? What are the consequences of making this error?
Type 2 are error are those errors in which null hypothesis are supposed to be accepted but it get rejected.
It means average sales per week is actually $8000 but it is calculated that average sales is less than $8000.
1,875 - 895 = 980 dollars they spent. 980 divided by 140 equals 7. They have been on their vacation for 7 days.
The way to do it can be explained like this:
Say AB and CD are the two parallel lines cut by a transversal at E and F respectively.
Then the pairs of alternate interior angles are:
Angle(AEF) and Angle(DFE)
Angle(CFE) and Angle(BEF)
Now lets prove if this is true:
<span>Angle(CFE) +Angle(DFE) = 180
(linear pair)
Also
Angle(CFE) +Angle(AEF) = 180
(Corresponding angles)
</span><span>Equate the above results:
Angle(CFE) +Angle(DFE) = Angle(CFE) +Angle(AEF)
</span><span>Angle(DFE) = Angle(AEF)
</span>Happens the same with
<span>Angle(CFE) = Angle(BEF)
</span>Hope this is very useful for you
