Answer:
Roman
Explanation:
The Romans had a Senate, so the Colonists implemented the idea into the colonies.
Hope it helps!
For Lincoln, allowing American democracy to succeed was compatible with the ideal of freedom; allowing secessionists to destroy it (in response to a democratic election) was not. In other words, Lincoln did not believe that true freedom was letting states do their own thing--and letting the pillars of American constitutional democracy run amok--but instead, in maintaining a union where the great experiment of democracy could flourish. As Lincoln himself said quite clearly in the Gettysburg Address, he was committed to making sure "...that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." I suppose you can argue that Lincoln's vision of freedom was not worth the price, but you cannot deny that he had a vision of freedom--and that, for him, this vision was compatible with maintaining the historic, unprecedented political freedom that was achieved in 1776.
Answer:
B). It would help the writer form a central claim.
Explanation:
The given paragraph would assist in 'formation of the central claim' to the writer looking for evidence for drafting an argumentative essay on the Industrial Revolution. It <u>gives the description of both the positive, as well as, the negative aspects of the topic i.e. Industrial Revolution from which the writer can choose his stand and prepare his argument and evidence to support and substantiate his claim accordingly</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The. answer is A
Explanation:
when mexico had a fight they had a conversation message
#<em>C</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>O</em><em>n</em><em>L</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>
That fact indicates that every government decisions that made is most likely would benefit these companies.
In United States, 6 companies controlled 90% of the Media.
This will give them a lot of power to control informations that could influenced the outcome of the election. So they can pretty much appoint whichever candidates that suited their agenda.
