Answer:
In “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King explains the purpose and effectiveness ofnonviolent direct actions through the concept of negotiations.For example, Kingmentions “direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that acommunity which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.”King believes that tension is a good thing and that it is what is needed for direct actionto take place. Nonviolent can get one’s point across with hopefully less repercussions. Inaddition, King pulls an example from Socrates to strengthen his argument about whynonviolent direct action is the most effective way to handle things. For example, Kingwrites “Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realmof creative analysis and objective appraisal, so we must see the need for nonviolentgadflies to create the kind tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depthsof prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood.”Once again, it is thought that tension is a good thing when it comes to a controversialissue. Without tension, there can be no discussion, and without discussion, there can beno progress.
Explanation:
The answer is B. Add variety to the sentence structure.
Answer
English (and most other Western-European languages) adopted many words from Latin and Greek throughout history, because especially Latin was the Lingua Franca all through Antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and later.
However, English has many more words borrowed from Latin than have other Germanic languages, which it owes to the conquest of England by the Normans in the year 1066. The Normans spoke Norman French, which was still much closer to Latin than modern French, especially in spelling. From then on, French was used as the language of administration for a while, and much of this was incorporated into English even as the influence of Norman culture in England waned.
Note that, very, very long ago, in prehistoric times, the Germanic and Italic branches (the ancestor of Latin) diverged from the (supposed) proto-language called Proto-Indo-European. That's why e.g. English, Greek, Russian, Persian, Urdu, and Latin have certain things in common, although most similarities are now only apparent to the trained eye. The similarities you see between English and Latin are mostly caused by what happened after 1066.
