Some would argue the Soviet Union, while others say the US. It depends how you look at the question. There are certain things that prove it was the fault of one while some prove it was the fault of another.
Answer:
In late 19th century/early 20th century, the United States had become a global power with interests - and investments - around the globe. It was a new status and it had was symbolized by the victory in the Spanish-American War. The US was strong, modern and industrialized and it could support a powerful army and the powerful navy advocated by naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan. The "big stick diplomacy" meant that the US could impose its preferred outcomes abroad by military force if it wanted to. It translated into military interventions in the Caribbean to bring order in troubled nations and prevent European intervention, anathema to the Monroe Doctrine.
Explanation:
The government introduced legislative laws because they feared that the FR would simulate popular radicalism. The seditious meeting act was introduced and Habeas Corpus was suspended. *HOPE IT HELPS*
He invented fascism, a kind of government that puts the state before everything. Including personal liberties. All that kind of stuff was up to the state.
