The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.
Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.
Workers who have organized into unions have much more power to make changes than workers acting on their own. This power can be used through collective bargaining to negotiate improved wages and working conditions. The option of calling a legal strike, should negotiations fail, makes it much more likely that worker demands will be met.
<span>There was no pay, there was a lack of food and equipment. There were harsh conditions, and the work that was left unattended at home were reasons why it was so difficult to keep soldiers in the Continental Army.</span>
The venezuelan cartoonist view big stick diplomacy differently by viewing it as unnecessary. Hope you have a nice day!
<span>The correct answer is - they did not think the lifestyle of the 1920s was desirable. The term "lost generation" refers to a group of writers who were at their peak after the WWI, and came into this post-war world which was completely different to them. They couldn't see any good things in it, which is why they often wrote about how a dreadful era that was to be alive. </span>
