1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Basile [38]
3 years ago
12

6. The Dred Scott decision can be seen as supporting which side of the slavery debate?

History
2 answers:
mash [69]3 years ago
5 0
B. It defined where slavery could be allowed
DedPeter [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: B

Explanation:  The Dred Scott Decision enraged the North (particularly the abolitionists) because they believed that Congress supported slavery in the South.  The South (particularly slave owners) was satisfied with this decision because Congress claimed that they had no right to remove property that was owned by another, in other words, the slave owners had the right to keep their slaves.

You might be interested in
Which two groups favored passage of the Sherman Silver Purchase Act?
vesna_86 [32]
Hey! Your answer would be (miners and farmers). I hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a tropical rain forest?
ziro4ka [17]
A tropical rain forest is a densely wooded area that receives an annual rainfall of at least 100 inches and has broad-leafed evergreen trees that form a continuous canopy. 
4 0
3 years ago
Record at least eight examples of how interest groups are good or bad for democracy.
solong [7]
List of Cons of Interest Groups

1. They would often seek for the minority of people. 
Interest groups lead to pluralism, which critics contend that there is no common good, as there are many conflicting interests in society. What is good for one individual can be bad for other people. Critics also argue that interest groups would interfere with democracy, as they seek out benefits for minorities rather than the greater good of the majority. For example, the National Rifle Association has repeatedly blocked gun-control legislations, despite the fact that most citizens in the US actually want stricter laws on firearms.

2. They only have one track in mind. 
As interest groups usually have a single track in mind, they would only think about and look at their personal opinions, and not at those of the majority.

3. They are only effective for themselves. 
Another big argument by critics about these groups is that their system can really be effective only for economic interest groups, which normally have greater financial resources at their disposal. It is also believed that these groups would ignore the interests of the poor in favor of the middle and upper-class, who have more money and time to contribute.

4. They would commit serious crimes. 
According to past news, there are interest groups that have committed serious crimes, such as corruption, bribery, fraud, etc. There are even those who were involved in some cases and accused of giving threats to domestic social orders and extremists.

List of Pros of Interest Groups

1. They use a democratic process. 
Interest groups contribute a helpful democratic process to protect certain individuals as alternative in daunting the majority. Because of this, many people have the freedom to express and speak their suggestions and opinions.

2. They check the power of majorities. 
In the US political system, there exist the principles of democracy, which include the majority rule, but there is also the protection of rights of people who do not belong to the majority. Interest groups, such as those based on gender, ethnic and religious identities, can perform important checks on the powers of the majority.

3. They have the ability to motivate legislators. 
These groups can easily motivate legislators in promulgating their beliefs optimistically.

4. They allow for better representation of interests. 
Members of interest groups and other social movements believe that they should better advance their causes and interests, whether it is protecting civil rights, voting rights and the environment, by uniting themselves for collective action. By doing so, they demonstrate strength in numbers when it comes to politics.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the congress feel that reconstruction was a congressional task and not a presidential task
Olin [163]
Because all southern states were considered conquered territories  <span />
8 0
3 years ago
Archduke who was assassinated while on a visit to Sarajevo
Alex777 [14]
This would be Archduke franz Ferdinand. I hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The period of dual federalism (1865 - 1937) was marked by?
    8·1 answer
  • After a bitter civil war, francisco franco established in 1939 a fascist government in:
    14·1 answer
  • The territory of ancient mesopotamia is presently occupied by which country?
    15·1 answer
  • Why does the period 1789-1793 constitute a break?
    7·1 answer
  • In 1927, work began on a dam that would produce hydroelectric power and create the reservoir, Lake Murray. This dam was built to
    11·1 answer
  • Which was not a source of economic problems facing farmers in the late 1920s? A. new machinery B. falling crop prices C. drought
    10·1 answer
  • Mughal India had all of the following, which the Europeans wanted, except
    7·2 answers
  • What 3 events happened before March 5, 1770 to increase conflict between the Boston colonists and the British?
    13·1 answer
  • Anime həntai <br><br><br> Please I need answer
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me answer these questions
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!