Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
Answer:
an increase in urbanization.
The Supreme Court's role is to interpret the Constitution and limit the powers of the other branches<span> of government. The Supreme Court's power to do this is its power of</span>judicial<span> review, where it determines which laws and policies are constitutional, or allowable, and which are not.</span>
The Natchez Indians. The Natchez Indians were among the last American Indian groups to inhabit the area now known as southwestern Mississippi. Archaeological evidence indicates that the Natchez Indian culture began as early as A.D. 700 and lasted until the 1730s when the tribe was dispersed in a war with the French.
(Sorry if this doesn't help...)
He created many advanced war weapons and artillery along with promoting public education to be funded by the government.