Response plan, evacuation plan, and containment plan.
Answer: Analyze the data
Explanation:
Step 1: Identify the Problem. ...
Step 2: Review the Literature. ...
Step 3: Clarify the Problem. ...
Step 4: Clearly Define Terms and Concepts. ...
Step 5: Define the Population. ...
Step 6: Develop the Instrumentation Plan. ...
Step 7: Collect Data. ...
Step 8: Analyze the Data.
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>
Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896
Answer:
probative value
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides legal protection against search and seizure without good reason and without a search and seizure warrant. As we can see from the question above, Mick Stoner was charged with marijuana, which was taken from a legal dispensary in Denver, seized without a search warrant, so Mick Stoner's defense attorney disputes the evidential value of the evidence, claiming that the truck's initial search violated the Fourth Amendment.
To dispute the probative value of the evidence means that the evidence gathered, in this case, is not guaranteed, by itself, to support a condemnatory sentence, thus requiring the repetition in court of some of the evidence produced.
Answer:Did you process model because he argues that the criminal justice system has to protect suspect from errors in the abuse that can occur in the system I believe that is important because everybody deserves a chance. This is because in order for the crime control model to work effectively there needs to be minimal errors
Explanation:
