1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Crazy boy [7]
3 years ago
7

if the Nile River did not flood regularly how might life along the river have been different in ancient times

History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
7 0
They could not have grown crops from the fresh wet soil and they couldn't travel along the river as good.

Leviafan [203]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:  Nile is a river that literally breathes life into ancient Egypt and areas along the river. The Nile River periodically flooded every year at the same time areas near the river valley and deposited sludge from the river on the coast. In this way it soaked the soil with nutrients and minerals, and made the coasts a very fertile soil for the development of agriculture. It was a key factor for the development of Egypt as well as for all civilizations grown in river valleys. The development of agriculture increased wealth and power, agricultural products could be exchanged for other goods, etc. If we know that the ancient (even today's) Egypt in areas not along the Nile coast, consists of deserts, where agriculture is not possible at all. In this sense, if there was no flooding of the Nile, we can assume that the soil configuration would not be the same, but similar to the desert, because it is still close to the river, there would be some oases with greenery due to the proximity of the water. But agriculture would certainly not be possible, because there would be no fertile soil. Life would be similar to that in the deserts, like the Bedouins possessing green oases with water as precious.

You might be interested in
Which guideline helps historians place arguments in historical context?
SpyIntel [72]
B. historians shouldn't project modern ideas
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to some historians, what percentage of the male population was killed in the war?.
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

The War of the Triple Alliance  which took place 1864 to 1870 in South America massacred up to 70% of the Paraguayan male population.

I hope this helps, L.E.

4 0
1 year ago
3. The 1807 Embargo Act prohibited trade with other countries.<br> True or false
Sever21 [200]
The answer is true. Have a great day!
4 0
2 years ago
The term “majority party" refers to:
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:Of most people

Explanation:

The majority party is the most if something

5 0
3 years ago
In the wake of the war of 1812, younger republicans like henry clay and john calhoun:
maxonik [38]
Hope this helps!please give me brainliest

thought new industries should receive nation government protection
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT a reason why working in factories was dangerous for children?
    9·1 answer
  • What did the Virginia Plan propose? Text to speech A:A. Two houses of Congress with representation based on state population B:B
    8·2 answers
  • What reason did perry give for his visit to Japan
    7·1 answer
  • About how many people died building the Great Wall of China?
    14·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP it’s important
    15·1 answer
  • One of samuel slater's contributions to the development of american business was the use of
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement explains why President Andrew Johnson had little influence over Reconstruction policy during his term of office?
    8·1 answer
  • What concepts/thoughts were learned about the Texas Revolution (one to three words maximum per concept).
    6·2 answers
  • Give three functions of the Kabaka of Buganda Kingdom during the pre-colonial
    12·1 answer
  • 3. Why did the delegates start the Preamble to the Constitution with the words "We, the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!