led to many arrest is the answer
We can see from this that it is crucial to avoid making the same errors that South Africa did by exhausting its gold reserves as a consequence of the gold rush that caused the depletion of gold.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is scarcity?</h3>
Generally, The underlying reality that there are only finite quantities of both human and nonhuman resources that can be used by the finest technological knowledge to generate only finite maximum amounts of any economic good is what is meant by scarcity as an economic term.
In conclusion, South Africa is the world's biggest producer of gold, chromium, and platinum, illustrating scarcity and the decisions any community must make about exploiting resources.
They require restrictions to prevent overusing their natural resources.
The inquiry asks how other nations may learn from South Africa's gold depletion in the 1900s. We can see that it's crucial not to make the same errors South Africa did by emptying their gold stockpiles during the gold rush.
Read more about scarcity
brainly.com/question/17899742
#SPJ1
Rapid inflation, cyclical unemployment, war, hurricanes, and floods are all examples of non-diversifiable risk
This is a kind of risk that affects the macro economy or large numbers of persons or groups within the economy and as a result cannot be eliminated via diversification
Well, one big benefit would more than likely be that if you have a strike and you go on for a long time and stop working your boss is going to give you what you want. They may not give you everything but they will more than likely give you most of your demands. But one big danger would be facing the fact of being fired. If you don't work and you go on strike you could be facing the fact of being fired. With this being said I personally think that this isn't a solution that people should go to because it can be dangerous because it can lead to death or the loss of a job.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Answer:
The proclamation would only apply to the Confederate States, as an act to seize enemy resources. By freeing slaves in the Confederacy, Lincoln was actually freeing people he did not directly control. The way he explained the Proclamation made it acceptable to much of the Union army.
Explanation: