1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
densk [106]
3 years ago
5

Sumerian city-states were ruled by councils elected by the citizens. a. True b. False

History
2 answers:
Zarrin [17]3 years ago
8 0
False because there were priests and there were no councils elected by citizens
baherus [9]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is False

Explanation

The Sumerians were a civilization of Mesopotamia between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers recognized for the advances in agriculture made by its inhabitants. Its social organization was hierarchical and stratified (as were those of all civilizations). At the top of the social pyramid was the king, who was followed in importance by priests, military chiefs and high-level officials. Subsequently, there were the merchants, junior officials, skilled craftsmen, finally, the peasants and artisans; at the lowest level of society corresponds to slaves. It was also characterized by being divided into cities, each one was centered on a temple dedicated to a god (patron of the city) and ruled by a patesi (The patesi were supreme priests and absolute military chiefs and an aristocracy constituted by bureaucrats and priests) or sometimes by a king. So, the correct answer is False as citizens did not chose the council or priest that represented them.

You might be interested in
Which statement describes a result of xenophobia in the 1920s
Dahasolnce [82]

led to many arrest is the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify Central Issues: If South Africa is the world’s leading producer of gold, chromium, and platinum, how is it an example o
castortr0y [4]

We can see from this that it is crucial to avoid making the same errors that South Africa did by exhausting its gold reserves as a consequence of the gold rush that caused the depletion of gold.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is scarcity?</h3>

Generally, The underlying reality that there are only finite quantities of both human and nonhuman resources that can be used by the finest technological knowledge to generate only finite maximum amounts of any economic good is what is meant by scarcity as an economic term.

In conclusion, South Africa is the world's biggest producer of gold, chromium, and platinum, illustrating scarcity and the decisions any community must make about exploiting resources.

They require restrictions to prevent overusing their natural resources.

The inquiry asks how other nations may learn from South Africa's gold depletion in the 1900s. We can see that it's crucial not to make the same errors South Africa did by emptying their gold stockpiles during the gold rush.

Read more about scarcity

brainly.com/question/17899742

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Rapid inflation, cyclical unemployment, war, hurricanes, and floods are all examples of
harkovskaia [24]

Rapid inflation, cyclical unemployment, war, hurricanes, and floods are all examples of non-diversifiable risk

This is a kind of risk that affects the macro economy or large numbers of persons or groups within the economy and as a result cannot be eliminated via diversification  


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Benefits and dangers of using strikes to help workers achieve their goals.
sineoko [7]
Well, one big benefit would more than likely be that if you have a strike and you go on for a long time and stop working your boss is going to give you what you want. They may not give you everything but they will more than likely give you most of your demands. But one big danger would be facing the fact of being fired. If you don't work and you go on strike you could be facing the fact of being fired. With this being said I personally think that this isn't a solution that people should go to because it can be dangerous because it can lead to death or the loss of a job.







I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'm so confused!!!!!!!!!!!!
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

The proclamation would only apply to the Confederate States, as an act to seize enemy resources. By freeing slaves in the Confederacy, Lincoln was actually freeing people he did not directly control. The way he explained the Proclamation made it acceptable to much of the Union army.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • -Match the Persian leader with his notable achievement or defeat.-
    6·1 answer
  • What purpose did the states have in adopting the Articles of Confederation?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was protecting individual freedom so important to the framers?
    15·1 answer
  • True or False - A social revolution accompanied the 1911 Republican Revolution.
    6·1 answer
  • how does the trend for females in labor force from 1890 to 1920 compare with general trend for male during the same period
    9·1 answer
  • Ancient Egypt was a polytheistic society. What does this mean?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the four-zone occupation not end up working for the long-term, leading to a split between Eastern and Western Germany?
    6·1 answer
  • Imagine that you are an abolitionist, such as Frederick Douglass, who has fought a life-long battle to end the practice of slave
    13·1 answer
  • List the kings of England and France and their achievements.
    6·1 answer
  • Write a one page essay explaining how Science and Technology contributed to American History and what is it's significance today
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!