The Achaemenid Empire (558–330 BC) of Persia, popularly referred to as the Persian empire, was a monarchy. It was ruled by a single hereditary leader, who considered himself divinely authorized to hold absolute power.
The Persian empire was a model of efficient ancient administration. The monarch appointed satraps as regional leaders, and delegated power in a way the preserved sufficient local autonomy to prevent most (non-Greek) subjects from wishing to revolt. It had an efficient system of roads and messengers, allowing rule over a large geographic area, and a regular system of taxation that established it on a sound financial footing. It also had a complex and uniform law code.
Answer:
b. Achilles and the son of Atreus
Explanation:
According to Homer from the extract, Achilles and the son of Atreus are angry with each other. as from the first line, the anger of Achilles is described "Sing. O goddess, the anger of Achilles, son of Peleus..." and in the last line the disagreement between Achilles and the son of Atreus was clearly shown, " day on which the son of Atreus, king of men and great Achilles, first fell out with one another...",
The predominant religion is Buddhism
Answer:
The correct option is;
1955 to 1970
Explanation:
In the two decades after 1950 the marine and inland fisheries growth rate was 6 % per year reaching 56 million tonnes in 1969 from 18 million tonnes in 1950. There was a reduction in growth rate to 2 million tonnes to 2 % per annum reducing further to about 0 % in the 1990s.
The above trend is consistent with most world's fishing areas, as they reached their captured fisheries production maximum potential.
On the other hand, aquaculture production growth rate has increased from 5% per annum between 1950 to 1969 to 10% per annum in 1990 forward.
Answer And Explanation: <u><em>No taxation without representation" is a slogan originating during the 1700s that summarized one of 27 colonial grievances of the American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies, which was one of the major causes of the American Revolution. In short, many in those colonies believed that, as they were not directly represented in the distant British Parliament, any laws it passed affecting the colonists (such as the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act) were illegal under the Bill of Rights 1689, and were a denial of their rights as Englishmen.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>HOPE THIS HELPS PLS MARK BRAINLIEST</em></u>
