Answer:
The Neutrality Act of 1935 prohibited exporting arms and ammunition to any foreign nation at war. ... In November 1939, two months after the beginning of World War II, Congress passed the Neutrality Act of 1939, which lifted the 1935 arms embargo and placed all sales to belligerent nations on a “cash and carry” basis.
Explanation:
<h2>
<em><u>p</u></em><em><u>lease</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>m</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>as</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>bri</u></em><em><u>lliant</u></em><em><u> answer</u></em></h2>
Because it has more then 600 castles :)
Brainliest Please
The correct answer is:
Answers will vary. Most students might note that it was necessary for Jefferson to prove
that the Continental Congress presented a united front to the world in order to prove that
independence was the true goal of the colonies. Others may state that since each state
provided signers to the document, it was obvious that all thirteen colonies accepted it.
As to the question of whether the 13 colonies could have declared independence if they
weren’t unanimous, answers will vary. Most students might state that independence
would be difficult without the support of all thirteen colonies, but some might say
independence without consensus was still possible. For instance, colonies that objected
could be absorbed into Canada or find a way to peacefully co-exist with those that
seceded.
Resources here: https://www-tc.pbs.org/ktca/liberty/pdf/2_questions_answers.pdf
All the options are correct.
As we know before Missouri Compromise of 1820, there were 11 free states and 11 save states and so there was a balance of power between North and South. The admission of Missouri as a slave state would result the imbalance. So we see Henry Clay, a congressman came with Missouri Compromise which provided for admission of Missouri as a slave state along with Maine as a free state in order to maintain the balance of power. It also prohibited slavery in the north of 36*30 parallel, excluding Missouri. So ultimately resolved the heated issue of the time in the Senate over slave states and free states. As it was a controversial act, it was later declared unconstitutional and was repealed by Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
The correct answer is the first choice above, where it reads, 'maturing of rights which a party can legally act upon.'
Vesting of rights is defined as having to provide an immediate
and secured right for the present or future by which it couldn't be taken away
when given by another party.