1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
3 years ago
9

Help please : ) it's pretty easy​

History
2 answers:
Minchanka [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Slavery in the Western Territories. To many nineteenth century Americans, the expansion of slavery into Western territories caused a great deal of controversy. ... The federal government, hoping to prevent a civil war, temporarily resolved the issue with compromises.

Explanation:

koban [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

They expanded westward, therefore colonizing more of America and making new states. But, as new states were added, they have to decide which states are going to be slave states and which are going to be free states, and the Northerners really didn't want slavery, even though they still treat the African Americans worse there than when they were slaves. And then, the dispute got worse and worse, eventually starting a war within the country which left them very vulnerable to attack from other countries, but it never happened.

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from Section 6 of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. Every common carrier subject to the provisions of this a
Olin [163]

Answer:

railroads must clearly publish and honor posted schedules and fees

Explanation:

During the late 1800s, railway companies were shortchanging their customers by hiking the prices of tickets to only some customers and as a result, the Interstate Commerce Act was passed in 1887 to stop this anomaly.

This Act was meant to ensure fairness in prices and regulate the excesses of the rail officials by requiring them to publish and honor posted schedules and fees.

4 0
3 years ago
The idea that all people are born with the natural rights of life, liberty, and property is most directly associated with the wr
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

4) John Locke

Explanation:

In 1689, John Locke wrote "Second Treatise of Government" in which he mentioned about the equal rights of the individuals. He spoke about the natural rights of the individuals that are an inseparable part from the lives of the people. He mentioned that the fundamental rights are "life, liberty and property". Preserving life, freedom to choose and rights to own property are the basic natural rights. It is the duty of the government to secure these rights and protect each individual from being prohibited from these rights.

6 0
2 years ago
Why do we humans have to constantly improve our work tools?
Alla [95]

Answer:

to constantly improve our productivity, durability of structures and items, quality of products, ease, ect ect

8 0
3 years ago
How should September 11 be remembered in world history?
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

It should be remember at the fact that this day change the country forever.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What would happen if we lost the Bill of Rights? can someone help me
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Hello Adam Here!!!

Explanation:

1. We would not have freedom of speech. In some nations, even in Europe people have been jailed for saying or even tweeting things that the government or authorities deemed distasteful in some manner.

2. Gun rights would be non-existent. Some would cheer this. The problem however is this means most if not all firearms would be in the hands of the government.

3. Say you own a home. Well, in times of crisis and conflict the government could put military personnel in your house if not for Amendment III.

4. Speaking of homes. What if the authorities could just come in and start searching around in your home and belongings just because they felt like it? No warrant and no probable cause? Amendment IV protects us from that.

5. Double jeopardy and due process. A citizen cannot be tried twice for the same offense (with very few and outstanding exceptions). Even if accused of a crime, a citizen cannot just be thrown in prison based simply on an accusation.

6. A citizen would not have the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury. Imagine spending 5 years behind bars only to finally be plonked in front of a judge who determines your guilt or innocence.

Hope This Helps! From Adam

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A group of people with common practices, activities, and interests is called a _____.
    7·2 answers
  • One of the core beliefs of all religions is the right to be
    6·1 answer
  • The founder of modern China is _____.
    14·2 answers
  • In what two ways did patrons support the Renaissance movement in Italy?
    14·2 answers
  • 3. What did Lincoln state about secession in
    9·1 answer
  • List four causes that led to the Renaissance:
    9·2 answers
  • What conflict was affecting Europe and Asia when the speech was given?
    11·1 answer
  • Can somebody give me some facts about Asia
    10·2 answers
  • Please help will give brainliest use explantion or no brainliest
    8·2 answers
  • The use of Federal money to build which road was controversial?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!