If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would have removed General McClellan because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.
<h3>Why should
General McClellan removed?</h3>
During the The Battle of Antietam which can be described as the single bloodiest day during the combat in the Civil War.
It was a battle that that was presented as a Union victory in the Northern press can be seen as effect a tactical draw.
An during this battle , McClellan was so frustrated and this makes him to fail by not be able to destroy Lee's arm.
However, Lincoln officially removed him from being the commander hence If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would have removed General McClellan because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.
Learn more Lincoln at:
brainly.com/question/26112254
#SPJ1
answer:
he vetoed most reconstruction legislation.
Explanation:
After the Civil War, Radical Republicans in Congress and President Andrew Johnson differ over the terms and conditions for readmitting the withdrew states to the Union. President Johnson saw Reconstruction as an official duty and blocked congressional activities.
Congress tried to check the power of the presidency, which had extended in wartime, and took a less appeasing position toward the previous Confederate states on issues of loyalty, governance, and the privileges of black citizens. In 1867 and 1868 Congress passed four Reconstruction Acts over Johnson's vetoes.