A system of checks and balances helps prevent one branch from being able to gain too much power. So your answer is a system of checks and balances.
Answer:
Put this in your own words this isn't the full answer but a few things that will really help you
Explanation:
The Federalists and the Anti-federalists were the first major political parties in the United States. The Anti-federalists were known as the Democratic-Republican Party, today called Democrat. Both of these groups were political parties in the early days of our country under the Constitution. But both parties had different believes and went for different causes. Both were supportive of our new country. They had different visions of how the country should operate.
The Federalists believed in having a strong federal government, to support the people. They believed one of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government lacked power. The Federalists believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution where the power would all be equal, just like today, with the government it's all in stages that can approve and decline things the other stage of our government wants, keeping everything at an equal peace. A loose interpretation would allow the federal government to do many things not specifically listed in the Constitution. The Federalists supported Hamilton’s debt plan and the development of a national bank. The Anti-federalists or Democrats wanted to opposite
Answer:
The size of the Atlantic slave trade dramatically transformed African societies. The slave trade brought about a negative impact on African societies and led to the long-term impoverishment of West Africa. This intensified effects that were already present amongst its rulers, kinships, kingdoms and in society.
Explanation:
The war novels before "All Quiet on the Western Front" they tended to romanticize what war was like, making others believe that war was a symbol of glory, honor, patriotic duty, and adventure, "All Quiet on the Western Front" sets out to show people how actually the war was: An unromantic vision of fear, meaninglessness, and butchery. World War I demanded this depiction more than any war before it—it completely altered mankind’s conception of military conflict with its catastrophic levels of carnage and violence, its battles that lasted for months, and its gruesome new technological advancements (e.g., machine guns, poison gas, trenches) that made killing easier and more impersonal than ever before.
