Answer:
Old Imperialism - large numbers of European settlers; acquisition of gold and trade goods; colonies in Americas; focus on the acquisition of land
New Imperialism - acquisition of raw materials; small numbers of European settlers; colonies in Africa and Asia;
Explanation:
The Old Imperialism and the New Imperialism have numerous things that distinguish them, including the goals of them, the migration of people, as well as the parts of the world where they were occurring. The Old Imperialism was focused on the Americas. Its goals were to to gain as much territory as possible, as well as gold and trade goods. The migration of Europeans during the Old Imperialism was immense, with millions of people moving in the colonies. The New Imperialism was focused on the territories in Africa and Asia. The goals were to exploit the raw materials, cheap labor force, and use them as market places. Very small migration from Europe occurred during the New Imperialism, as the mother nations were in much better condition and were developing rapidly.
5-Gibbons appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1824. ... In reaching its decision, the Court interpreted the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution for the first time. The clause reads that "Congress shall have power to regulate commerce ... among the several States."
The rise of totalitarian regimes in some countries
Answer:
The emergence of imperial Japan
Foreign affairs
Achieving equality with the West was one of the primary goals of the Meiji leaders. Treaty reform, designed to end the foreigners’ judicial and economic privileges provided by extraterritoriality and fixed customs duties was sought as early as 1871 when the Iwakura mission went to the United States and Europe. The Western powers insisted, however, that they could not revise the treaties until Japanese legal institutions were reformed along European and American lines. Efforts to reach a compromise settlement in the 1880s were rejected by the press and opposition groups in Japan. It was not until 1894, therefore, that treaty provisions for extraterritoriality were formally changed.
