Do you think president Johnson’s actions deserved to have him removed from office

History

2 answers:

aleksley [76]3 years ago

7 0

Answer: no because th e rumours have only come out since he became prime minister

Explanation: hope this helped not sure if answered question.

Sophie [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

President Johnson deserved to be removed from office because he violated current legislation.

Explanation:

Johnson was impeached on February 24, 1868 by the United States House of Representatives. The reason for the impeachment was Johnson's violation of the felony and misdemeanor law. Under this law the president could only remove individuals from office in the executive cabinet if the senate agreed to the dismissal. Johnson dismissed Edwin M. Stanton without consulting the Senate and therefore violated a law and deserved to be ousted as president.

You might be interested in

BRUhHH hELp MEeE- AGH-

Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Its B. include health,privacy,and the pursuit of income

Explanation:

This is B. because you should not be controlled by the king.

And you should not be given rights only when you are adults, us kids and students should have rights to. A. just does not make sence. Last but not least B. makes the most sence because we should have health, privacy, and income.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!:)

p.s brainliest? please

7 0

2 years ago

In matters of foreign policy, which of these are state governments NOT allowed to do? A) export goods to china. B) initiate a wa

steposvetlana [31]

The correct answer is C Initiate a war with Iraq.

States within the US have the ability export and import goods from other countries. However, states are not allowed to declare war on other countries. This result to declare war is reserved to the US Congress, as established in the United States Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did China rebuild its empire after years of war?

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

They worked very hard.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was a common problem for small farmers?

olganol [36]