Answer:
A) The account receivables turnover is 15, and B) the number of days sales in receivables is 24.3 days.
Explanation:
A) FORMULA FOR ACCOUNT RECEIVABLES TURNOVER =
NET SALES / AVERAGE ACCOUNT RECEIVABLES
Given information -
Net sales = $1500,000
Average account receivables = $100,000
Putting the values in formula -
= $1500,000 / $100,000
= 15
B) FORMULA FOR NUMBER OF DAYS SALES IN RECEIVABLES =
365 / ACCOUNT RECEIVABLES TURNOVER
= 365 / 15
= 24.3 DAYS
Answer:
The correct statement is expressed by option B - Firms with a low-cost position can reduce the threat of rivalry in an industry.
Explanation:
Firms with a low-cost position can reduce the threat of rivalry in an industry based on these reasons:
Firstly, these firms can decide to set their prices to be the same as the prices of higher-cost competitors.
Secondly, low-cost firms can decide to price their goods or services a little bit below the prices of their high-cost rivals.
Answer:
hi im just getting my points
Explanation:
and im good btw
Answer:
A. The nature and character of the actions the company is taking to improve the performance of its value chain activities
Explanation:
The corporate culture of a company is essential for a company to be well positioned in the market.
It is defined as the set of guidelines that will guide the behavior of the employees of an organization, therefore it is composed of the set of policies, rules, procedures, behaviors, values, etc., that bring identity to a company and helps the practice of ethical values and promotion development of each employee.
Therefore, all the alternatives in the question above are adequate to the organizational culture, except for the letter A, which corresponds to the nature and character of the actions that the company is taking to improve the performance of its value chain activities, since the management of the supply chain A company's value will improve the way the processes in the organization are carried out to generate value for the customer.
Answer:
The sentence is unethical if there is a clear responsability on the mistakes. If the mistakes were made, and no one can be truly held accountable for that, then, the sentence is not unethical.
Explanation:
For example, if the government is corrupt, and officials actively commit embezzlement, the phrase "mistakes were made" is unethical because it is diverting the personal responsability of the corrupt officials.
But if for example, there is a volcano eruption, and the goverment tries its best to avoid casualties, but because of some involuntary mistakes some people still die, the phrase is not unethical because the mistakes were not voluntary and the consequences of those were not intended.
