Answer:
Explanation:
Ok this was hard but I think I got it
Stamp Act 1763
Proclamation 1763
Sugar Act 1764
Townshend Act 1767
Boston massacre 1770
Continental Congress 1774
Intolerable Act 1774
Tea Act-Boston tea party 1773
Lexington and concord April 19, 1775
Continental Congress May 10 ,1775
Bunter Hill June 17 ,1775
Declaration of Independence July 4,1776
Answer:
During the Industrial Revolution, the workers were treated like parts within a machine simply because they had no protections and the employers could exploit the workers in the name of profits. As a result, workers were placed in horrible working conditions for smaller wages as new groups joined the labor pool.
While some fought unfair employment practices, others thought that the solution was to get rid of capitalism altogether. Socialism was viewed as the most fair way to distribute the fruits of the labor as everyone could take according to his/her need.
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
I want to say A a factory employs many workers doing different jobs to produce a car. Factories do mass producing
