Answer:
as we know our country is rich in natural resources as coal and minerals industries in Jamshedpur and glass plants also in Bhilai we know India is not totally developed because of some circumstances
Explanation:
As
of now, the government is doing an enough job to ensure that human rights are
being protected through providing basic human rights such as food, water, and
shelter. Though this is the case, we cannot deny the fact that there should be
progress in terms of the different possibilities that the government may offer
in order to address the current problems available right now. These human
rights are being addressed, but of course, there should always be progress.
Celine is most likely suffering from <u>"clinical depression".</u>
Depression ranges in seriousness from mild, brief scenes of pity to serious, relentless despondency. Clinical depression is the more-extreme type of sorrow, otherwise called significant misery or real depressive issue. It isn't the same as sorrow caused by a misfortune, for example, the demise of a friend or family member, or a restorative condition, for example, a thyroid issue.
Answer:
Through regulation, taxation, subsidies and enforcing the antitrust laws.
Explanation:
According to Samuelson and other modern economists, governments have four main functions in a market economy — to increase efficiency, to provide infrastructure, to promote equity, and to foster macroeconomic stability and growth.
The government tries to combat market inequities through regulation, taxation, and subsidies.
Examples of this include breaking up monopolies and regulating negative externalities like pollution. Governments may sometimes intervene in markets to promote other goals, such as national unity and advancement.
One way we do this is by enforcing the antitrust laws. ... But competition can only thrive if firms respect the antitrust laws, which are the rules of the free market. When businesses break those rules—such as by agreeing to fix prices—they effectively steal from consumers and harm the economy.
Answer:
In Baldwin vs Foxx case, <em>it was decided by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that it was wrong to discriminate against someone for employment due to his his sexual orientation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</em>
Explanation:
Title VII of the Civil Right Act gives freedom to be employed without being discriminated against according to your sex or sexual orientation.Thus, in Baldwin vs Foxx case, the plaintiff, Baldwin prayed to be allowed to work and not to be discriminated against for his being a gay. This was opined eventually by the EOOC.
