The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form 
, where 
and 
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when 
, which occurs for 
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by 
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use 
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Answer: 1/3 would be the answer because the slope is positive.
Answer:w =A/1
Step-by-step explanation:
3.14 x 10⁻³ has the value 0.00314
The exponent tells us the number of times the decimal has to move. The sign of the exponent tells us the direction of the movement of the decimal.
The negative sign of the exponent means that the decimal has to move to the right.
From 0.00314, decimal move to the right 0003.14
If the decimal is positive, it means that the decimal point moved to the left of the number.
3.14 x 10³ in expanded form is 3140
From 3140. decimal move to the left 3.140
