Answer:
1. Roma videmus
-Here, Rome would need to be in the accusative case since it is the direct object. The correct word would be <em>Romam.</em>
2. Romani viae visito
-Visito is first person meaning "I visit." The correct word would be <em>visitant.</em>
-Again, you need to use the accusative case for direct objects. The correct word here would be <em>vias.</em>
3. Romani pugnae spectabimus
-Spectabimus translates to "We will watch." The correct word would have been <em>spectabunt.</em>
-Again, battles needs to be in the accusative case since it is being watched. The correct word would be <em>pugnas.</em>
Hope this helps.
Answer:
dinkopo gets ano po yun?? pa explain po
Answer:
your question in eglish:
What is missing in this city?... Truth./ What more for your dishonor?... Honor./ Is there more to be put to it?... Shame./ The demo to live exposes itself,/ As much as the fame a exalt, In a city where lack / Truth, honor, shame. It can be recognized in the verses of Gregório de Matos: *
1 point
a) character of a verbal game typical of the Baroque style, in the service of a satire-like critique of the moral profile of the city of Bahia.
b) the verbal game character of 16th century religious poetry, sustaining pious lamentation for the Gentile's lack of faith.
c) pedagogical style of neoclassical poetry, through which the poet invests himself in the functions of an authentic moralizer.
d) character of a verbal game typical of the Baroque style, in the service of the lyrical expression of the sinful poet's repentance.
e) pedagogical style of neoclassical poetry, sustaining in a lyrical tone the poet's reflections on the moral profile of the city of Bahia.
Explanation:
Answer:
sorry I don't know what you're asking
