Answer:
it's b I mean it could be c but i choose b
Answer:
- <u><em>D. No, because $100,000 is much greater than the values used in the experiment.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Correlations</em>, when have strong correlation coefficients, which r = 0.9 is, may be good predictors within the limits of the range of the data.
Trying to extrapolate the <em>linear relationship</em> between the variables, <em>x = advertising spending and y= product sales</em>, way beyond the limits of the data used for the study, is too risky, because the data may be linear just for some stages (ranges) but behave very different in other ranges.
As, the option D. states, <em>$100,000 is much greater that the values used in the experiment</em>; hence, the correlation would likely would not be a good predictor for that input.
Answer:
Criminal conduct
.
Explanation:
For there to be a criminal violation, that is, conduct contrary to the law that can be classified as criminal, punishable by the judges, there must be two main components:
On the one hand, there must be a criminal intent, that is, the will to carry out a crime and the physical action intended for that purpose: for example, in the case of carrying out a robbery, there must be the intention to steal and the set of mobilizations physical objects intended for said theft (threats, struggles, etc.).
On the other hand, there must be a criminal conduct, which implies that the conduct carried out during the criminal intent is liable to obtain the desired criminal result: for example, in case of wanting to steal, carry out the necessary actions to do so.