All categories

3 years ago

What was true about the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?

History

2 answers:

mariarad [96]3 years ago

8 0

<h2>Answer:</h2>

The correct option is D (All of the above mentioned)

<h3> Explanation:</h3>

President Lyndon Johnson utilized the Gulf of Tonkin occurrence to enlarge the war.

Inlet of Tonkin episode, complex maritime occasion in the Gulf of Tonkin, off the shore of Vietnam, that was introduced to the U.S. Congress on August 5, 1964, as two unmerited assaults by North Vietnamese torpedo water crafts on the destroyers. Maddox and Turner Joy of the U.S. Seventh Fleet and that prompted the Gulf of Tonkin. It was the Congressional goals approving the organization of US battle powers to South Vietnam, which happened following a maritime commitment between the US and North Vietnam.

Troyanec [42]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

all of the above

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Who became a fascist dictator of Italy in the 1930s?

NeX [460]

Answer: Benito Mussolini

Explanation:

(Learned this in class)

6 0

3 years ago

After the burning of Constantinople by The Crusaders, the Byzantine empire was

julia-pushkina [17]

Weakened, and Constantinople was never able to regien its power before the burning.

6 0

3 years ago

Why was the scientific revolution considered a intellectual movement?

xenn [34]

Answer:

The period saw a fundamental transformation in scientific ideas across mathematics, physics, astronomy, and biology in institutions supporting scientific investigation and in the more widely held picture of the universe. The Scientific Revolution led to the establishment of several modern sciences.

3 0

3 years ago

An archeologist discovers an official-looking seal during an archeological dig. The seal is cylindrical in shape and is much lik

KIM [24]

Answer:

D. The civilization had a functioning government in place that decided the law of the land.

Explanation:

The discovery of the official-looking seal and the clay tablet containing the laws which the civilization have to follow shows that they have a functioning government. This means that the society has a leader and they followed a set of rules.

It wasn't clearly stated in the statement whether the head was a king but it mentioned that the seal was much like what a king would use. So we cannot conclude that all civilizations were ruled by kings. This makes choice A incorrect. 

Based on the information given, we're not sure whether it was the king who wrote the rules on the clay tablets. This makes choice B incorrect.

The statements above didn't show any evidence that the rulers were governors and not kings, so we cannot assume as well. This makes choice C incorrect.

3 0

3 years ago

Federalist identify teh basic arguments for and against ratification of the constitution

bekas [8.4K]

Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.

Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.

Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.

7 0

3 years ago