Answer:
No, because marriage is a public and not a private fact.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Alice who was briefly married at the age of 16. She is now 28 years old and plans to marry Henry in the spring. Henry's sister found out about Alice's first marriage and then told Henry's parents. Alice now wants to sue Henry's sister for public disclosure of private facts. In this case, Alice does not have a case against Henry's sister because marriage is considered a public and not not considered a private fact. Private facts can be regarded ones personal details which has not been disclosed in the public domain. These could be private romantic encounter or someone sexual orientation. Immediately this personal details get disclosed publicly by the person, it is considered as "public fact" because it has moved into the public domain. Public disclosure of fact is passing across of fact-at-issue on to public, so that the fact can public knowledge.
Answer:
Vishnu Vishnu Vishnu Vishnu Vishnu Vishnu
This would be an example of "pluralistic ignorance".
In social psychology, pluralistic ignorance is a circumstance in which a larger part of gathering individuals secretly dismiss a standard, yet mistakenly expect that most others acknowledge it, and thusly oblige it. This is likewise portrayed as "nobody accepts, however everybody feels that everybody accepts".
Answer:
No, a single party's presence and its ideology's popularity do not ensure adequate contestation.
