Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
I would need to see the models to answer this question.
The problem says that the expression (3x + 5)(5x − 1) <span>represents the area of the floor of the building in square meters. Therefore, to solve this problem you have to follow the proccedure shown below.
1. First, to simplify the expression (3x + 5)(5x − 1) you must apply the distributive property. Then, you obtain:
15x</span>²-3x+25x-5
2. Then, you have:
15x²+22x-5
3. As you can see, the correct answer is the last option: 15x²+22x-5
Answer:
C. volume
Step-by-step explanation:
The response variable in this scenario would be the volume of the usable lumber. That is because this variable depends completely on the height of the cherry trees that are being measured. The higher that the cherry trees are the more volume can be expected to get from cutting these trees down. The opposite goes for trees that are smaller, they would decrease the total expected volume that will be received from the usable lumber since there would be less amount of tree to cut down.
Your answer can only be simplified to
256x^10 - 384^8 - 448^6
