Answer:
Explanation:
Because land never depreciates, Western Bank & Trust wanted to distribute a higher percentage of the purchase price to the building, rather than the land. By allocating 90% of the purchase price to the building, rather than a more accurate 70%, Western Bank & Trust increases the depreciation amount of the building each year. For tax purposes, the IRS requires that the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) be used as the depreciation method used by companies. Under this method, the IRS specifies the useful life for a specific asset. MACRS also ignores residual value of an asset at the end of its useful life. By stating that the building was worth 90% of the total purchase price, Western Bank is attempting to increase its tax deduction from the IRS, because only the building depreciates, not the land. This improper allocation of the total purchase amount violates GAAP principles, which require that accounting information be “relevant and have faithful representation.” The information must be “complete, neutral, and free from error” (Nobles, Mattison, & Matsumura, 2014). For Western Bank to provide complete, neutral, and free from error information, it should record the transaction honestly: 70% to the building, 30% to the land. This dishonest representation is harmful to the federal government in that it is allowing Western Bank to take more money than what it is owed. If these kinds of situations happen on a large scale, it could have a huge impact on the economy in general. Source: Nobles, T., Mattison, B., & Matsumura, E. M. (2014). Horngren's Accounting, 10th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. Student 2
The choices were A) store of value. B) medium of exchange. C) unit of account. D) double coincidence of wants
<span>The answer is </span>B<span>) medium of exchange. The money was used as a medium to purchase a product. </span><span> It</span><span> can be observed on different transactions of customers to obtain their needed item. It can be a necessity or a want that person must have.</span>
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
Answer:
Call Scripting System
Explanation:
The Call Scripting System is frequently used by telemarketers among others when attending to contacts, clients or customers. The call script also referred to as the Cold Calling Script makes use of logic, correct wordings or talking points to assist an agent when dealing with a prospective customer.
These scripts are ideal because they can be integrated into telephony and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Systems to ensure that an agent gets handy and appropriate information about a customer or client.
The Call Scripting System is widely used across call centres and Customer Satisfaction Centres. An advantage of this system is that it guarantees Consistency in customer data information that is being used to issue resolutions to clients irrespective of the agent on Customer Service Duty.
Answer:
$254
Explanation:
First we must calculate the employee's remaining taxable portion = wage base - year to date earnings = $118,500 - $114,400 = $4,100
Then we multiply the employee's remaining taxable portion times FICA-OASDI tax rate = $4,100 x 6.2% = $254.20, we round down to the nearest dollar = $254
