Answer:
A. The researchers, led by plant geneticist Philipp Simon, haven't limited themselves to the color orange."
Explanation:
'Carrorts with Character' is an article written by Erin K. Peabody. The article talks about genetically created carrots by geneticist Philipp Simon and health benefits of these variant colorful carrots.
The central idea, therefore, is the genetically carrots created by genecist Philipp Simon.
The supporting evidence, thus, for the text is option A. This statement supports the central idea that Philipp Simon, a genecist, did not stop at red carrot only but created a rainbow of carrots with different health benefits.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Answer:
Notice he doesn’t say “great minds”, or “geniuses” or “intelligent people”. He’s not talking about IQ or processing power. He’s not saying that smart scientists or philosophers like himself are always attacked by the unintelligent. He says “great spirits”, and a man of that caliber usually chooses his words quite carefully. He’s talking about spirit.
Spirit is not of this world. It is not concerned with the same functions or subjects as the mind. I would say it is rooted/connected to something much deeper, within.
Mind is often opposed to Spirit, because mind seeks to control. Spirit is something different, it can relate to a certain quality of intelligence perhaps, but I’d put it more on the levels of energy, courage, truth and justice. Spirit knows, it can operate with the mind’s help, but it doesn’t even have to ask questions or perform any experiments in our physical space to know certain truths.
When the rare man comes along who embodies those virtues and who acts from Spirit, society - even some of the “great minds” of the time - tend to beat him down, and often kill him. Look at MLK, Gandhi, John Lennon, JFK, the American founding fathers (who had to go to war for their ideas & beliefs, and many of whom were killed), Copernicus, Jesus, Socrates, there are many examples. The physical world is a place of logic and self-preservation, which are often at odds with truth and justice, sadly.
You may consider the following:
Introduction: offers a view of the main purpose and an overview of what the paper will be about.
As the paper is been worked, the writer should constantly check the introduction to make sure it continues to make sense with the rest of the information. For the introduction, the writer should consider and cover the following main points:
- Main problem to address.
- Solution to the problem and how the perspective and opinions offered in the argument influence the way readers think about the topic.
- To go back to the planning stage, conduct further research, continue writing, or edit what is written.
Body Paragraphs: These should evidence the thesis offered in the introduction The body paragraphs should develop the main idea with primary and secondary sources, thinking about:
- Meaning intended for each paragraph.
- Evidence to use and how the reader may be convinced the information is true and what the strongest or weakest points are.
- If needed, there may be point in which more research should be developed before continue writing.
Conclusions: It offers a brief restatement of the main topic and summarize the main points The conclusion should reinforce the analysis and findings.
<span>An independent clause is a clause that can stand alone as a sentence (i.e., it expresses a complete thought). An independent clause, like all clauses, has a subject and verb. When there are no dependent clauses in the same sentence as an independent clause, the independent clause is a simple sentence.</span>
So basically it just works. Yes