1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zzz [600]
3 years ago
12

In what ways did president kemal reform turkish society at the end of the ottoman empire?

History
1 answer:
natta225 [31]3 years ago
7 0
Atatürk's Reforms<span> (</span>Turkish<span>: </span>Atatürk Devrimleri<span>) were a series of political, legal, religious, cultural, social, and economic policy changes that were designed to convert the new </span>Republic of Turkey<span> into a </span>secular<span>, modern </span>nation-state<span> and implemented under the leadership of </span>Mustafa Kemal Atatürk<span> in accordance with </span>Kemalist ideology<span>. Central to these reforms were the belief that Turkish society would have to Westernize itself both politically and culturally in order to modernize</span>
You might be interested in
Where in the Constitution are the three branches of government described?
timama [110]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did de Gaulle revive French power?
Ipatiy [6.2K]
The correct answer is D

All of the above

<span>opened talks with communist nations such as China and Cuba
forged new ties to West Germany
developed a nuclear force</span>



8 0
3 years ago
Plzzz I need help right now and plzz dont do some random answers my grade depends on this. 15 points.
Nata [24]

Answer:

B atlantic provinces

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What role does the legislative branch (Congress) play in passing a law?
Yuri [45]
1. the legislative branch of government (Congress) examines a proposed bill and can either reject or vote to make it into a law.

2: when Congress votes in favor of making a bill into law, the Executive branch of government ( the president) signs it into law. If the president does not approve of the bill, he/she can veto it, and send recommendations to Congress to amend the bill.

if Congress approves a bill 2/3 or more of both the house and Senate, it shall become a law, and the president cant veto it.


3: The judicial branch of government (the supreme Court) interprets laws and upholds the constitution. When disagreements occur between the legislative and executive branches of government, the judicial branch has the power to resolve the disagreement by interpreting the law in view of existing laws and the consitution.

4: the varying roles of the three branches of government prove a system of checks and balances so that no branch of government can abuse power or authority over the governed.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name and explain two of the reasons the congressional committee identified for the recent financial crisis?
    5·1 answer
  • What political similarities are there among the nations of Britain, Australia, and New Zealand?
    11·1 answer
  • Blockade-running was done by many:
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASEEEE HELP QUICK!!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • The peak in 1945 would correlate to what international issue?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did Northern factories continue to function during and after the Civil War?
    13·1 answer
  • Who was head of the Schutzstaffel (SS)?
    15·2 answers
  • What are the main event which lead to the collapsed of soviet union (please the main point )
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one factor that led to the Renaissance? *
    14·1 answer
  • The Vietnam War was in some ways quite similar to the Korean War except for the outcome. Describe what the outcome of the Vietna
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!