Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
Answer:
<u>D. Americans are less likely to identify themselves as group members today than in the past.</u>
Explanation:
Recently Americans do not difine themselves or identify themselves as a group members. In other times belonging to a certain gruop was part of a very importan aspect of americans. Americans identites can be based on another facts, maybe more individialistc aspects than actually belonging to a certain social group.
Answer:
gfthhkigvddr4thk yufnib uTVck
When you compare newly proposed information to information you already know, you are using inference, which is a level of critical thinking.
Etymologically, the word "infer" means to "carry ahead." Inferences are information stages in reasoning that connect premises to logical conclusions. The dichotomy between deduction and induction in inference theory, which dates at least to Aristotle in Europe, is a classic one (300s BCE). Deduction is inference that results in logical conclusions from premises inference that are known to be true or that are presumed to be true, while the logic of correct inference is investigated. A universal conclusion is inferred by induction from specific evidence.
Inference is studied in many different domains. Researchers in the information domains of logic, argumentation studies, and cognitive psychology inference traditionally study human inference (i.e., how people draw conclusions); artificial intelligence researchers create automated inference systems to mimic human inference.
Learn more about inference here
brainly.com/question/18622044
#SPJ4
