Answer:
There is strong resistance to the extinction when performance has been maintained with a variable schedule of reinforcement
Explanation:
variable ratio schedule of reinforcement occurs when the response has been reinforced after several unpredictable responses. It creates a high rate of steadiness in the response in the schedule. Lottery and gambling are a good example of such type of reinforcement.
In an experiment when food is supplied to a rat after one break then after four breaks after one break, again and again, it is the variable-ratio schedules
Answer:
Occupational
Explanation:
Occupational ethics are the standard code of conduct which guide a profession. They are meant to be strictly adhered to and in the profession of law where justice is meant to be served. There shouldn’t be any anything shady and bribery is against the ethics.
This is why after a lengthy investigation, Legrand lost his license to practice law on charges of accepting bribes due to his violation of the occupational ethics.
This is the differential weathering.
Weathering is in general the phenomenon of rock disintegration and if different rocks disintegrate at different pace then it is differential.
The answer is, she most likely to live with her eldest son. In addition to late adulthood, According to socioemotional selectivity theory, shrinking social networks in adulthood are by choice. The older adults make the most of their emotional well-being by becoming progressively selective in their social contacts and interventions to control whether cognitive debility can be prohibited or even upturned caused in substantial development for a substantial proportion of individuals.
Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
