Answer:
The correct answer is Increase in accounts payable and unearned fees.
Explanation:
An account payable consists of a debt incurred by the company directly related to the economic activity of the company. An account payable is a debtor account in a company and indicates that it has to pay its suppliers (or other creditors).
The amounts that are accounted for as accounts payable come from the purchase of goods or services in terms of credit. So, accounts payable are similar to credits with the difference that banks are not involved.
Answer:
Price to pay now for the stock = $96.278
Explanation:
<em>The price of the stock would be the present value(PV) of the future cash flow expected from it discounted at the required rate of 13%</em>
<em>Hence we would add the present value of he dividend and the resent of he price at the end of the period</em>
PV = CF × (1+r)^(-n)
<em>CF- Cash Flow</em>
<em>R- rate of return- 13%</em>
<em>n- number of years</em>
PV of dividend = 2.60 × (1.13)^(-1) = 2.30
PV of stock price after a year = 120× (1.13)^(-1) = 93.97
Price to pay now for the stock = 2.30 + 93.97 = $96.278
Price to pay now for the stock = $96.278
Answer:
B. The amount of equity reported by Frankfort Corporation is $672,000
Explanation:
Equity earnings
= Frankfort's share in net income of Bradley
= 1,680,000 * 40%
= 672,000
Option B
Please comment if you face any issues****************
Answer:
$378,000
Explanation:
average weekly demand 70 per distribution center
average shipment size to each distribution center is 450
average lead time 3 weeks
each distribution center has a 3 week safety stock
pipeline inventory: average lead time x average demand per distribution center x average price of each modem x number of distribution centers = 3 weeks x 70 units x $360 x 5 = $378,000
pipeline inventory in transit = $378,000
The pipeline inventory represents the minimum average that the company needs to have to at least meet the weekly demand for its product.
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
