<u>Answer:
</u>
He acted in a good faith
<u>Explanation:
</u>
A good faith defense is used when a person is under legal charges and intentional fraud. this defense doesn't involve an intentional or willingness to defraud since those are essential to finding charges. The burden of proof isn't on the defendant to prove their faith. But the state has to prove that the defendant acted with the specific intent to defraud another party. In essence, they didn't act in good faith. someone who expresses an honest opinion doesn't charge as defraud.
<u>There is the factor that doesn't establish fraudulent intent includes as </u>
- Making an error in management
- Making a mistake in judgment
- Acting in a careless manner
So if someone believes in a business venture is sounds well and will succeed.
The correct answer is informed consent.
Informed consent is when a person has given their consent based on understanding the actions and facts of a study
Conflict theorists were critical of parsons's structural functionalist theory because they argued it presented <u>"an unrealistic image of consenus and harmony in society."</u>
Structural functionalism is the theoretical viewpoint that looks to comprehend the capacity that every part of culture plays in supporting the structure of a general public. In trying to do this, one of its fundamental premises is the possibility that people and culture work with a specific end goal to help the structure of their general public. As a structural functionalist, Parsons was, extremely keen on the possibility of social request. In the same way as other of his auxiliary functionalist cohorts, he held to the utilitarian hypothesis of stratification, the possibility that various leveled class frameworks and requests were essential for society to work.
Answer:
Untouchability is a social evil because the backward classes are denied the very fundamental rights, which are guaranteed to each and every citizen by the Constitution. ... Untouchability alienates people from the social structure and hinders the progress of the society as a whole
Answer:
Quantitative sociologists view data as numbers. Qualitative sociologists view data as: words. To Karl Marx, conflict between a small number of capitalists and a large number of workers would divide society.
